- That the existence of a god of any non-animistic religion is even probable?
- That a religious man is merely asserting that his assertion ‘god exists’ entails no more than that certain phenomena occur in certain sequences?
- That the term god is a metaphysical term?
- That the assertion God exists cannot be true or false?
- That the assertion ‘there is no god’ is nonsensical?
- That the question whether a ‘transcendent god exists is a genuine question’?
- That either of the assertions in 5 and 6 express propositions at all?
- That assertions such as ‘Jahweh is angry’ may be allowed to be significant?
- That the notion of a person whose essential attributes are non-empirical is an intelligible notion?
- The mere existence of a noun ‘god’ is enough to foster the illusion that there is a real being corresponding to it?
- That the noun ‘God’ is a genuine name.
- That there can be any transcendent truths about religion?
- That God is an object of faith not reason?
- That it is impossible for a sentence to be both significant and about God?
- That a state of mystical intuition is not a genuine cognitive state?
- That it is logically possible for men to be acquainted with God?
- That there is no reason why one should be prepared to believe a man when he says he is seeing a yellow patch and refuse to believe him when he says that he is seeing God?
- That an act of intuition can reveal a truth about any matter of fact?
- That any philosopher who states that he simply knows any moral or religious truth is merely providing material for the psychoanalyst?
- That religious experiences are interesting from any point of view?
Did you find this information helpful?
